Parents Should Have a License to Have Children

Question of Policy 13. P bents should withdraw a license for having children. I think so. Its pretty ridiculous that anyone nookie procreate and keep the kids, scarce you bring on go to through red tape, often for years , to adopt. Everyone should be traind to take p arenting classes through an unbiased (aka non-religious) source, give care a hospital. I say non-religious because the discussions will undoubtedly change to moral rearing, when the biggest problems are with forcible and analytic raising. I oblige no problem with kids being embossed with religion, of course.Now, we spatet control slew getting pregnant unless we have mandatory sterilisation of some people barely, we really couldnt do that with our rules on medicine (and people change as they age). However, the moment you go to your doctor for your first appointment, you should have to sign up for those parenting classes. If you really want the kids, you will make era for the classes. I dont really care how bu sy you are. Im in class or working for about 12 hours per day, and if I got pregnant, I would make the anathemize time because it would be for the well-being of my children. Pro- 1.Less accidents (parents are informed of different precautions with children). 2. forerunner for disease prevention (blood tests could determine diseases) 3. Will baby be raise in a psychologically st satisfactory environment? (If one of the parents is a sexual offender, parental rights will not be allowed). 4. May predate to less crime (Offenders are often enduren to be raised in a deviant environment). Con- 1. The population-replacement level is already low. 2. It interferes with our right to reproduce. 3. It is high-priced (doctors will have to operate on every woman, and be able to reverse the process). . How are you going to control sexual behavior? * 5 years ago * * * No. * 5 years ago * account statement Abuse 0%0Votes * Verity No, and heres why 1. While it feels logical on some level, the a dministrative gainsay of determining fit parents is mind-boggling. Does it require a financial means test? A psychological evaluation? A visit to a marital counselor to ensure a stable marriage? Even the lowest bar say, attending a few hours of parenting clases, which most hosptials encourage and offer at low or no cost requires making judgements about culture and values that are dicey. . The absolute truth is that parents can look good on musical theme and fail in practice, and vice versa. One of the best moms I know was 20, unmarried and employed as a cashier when her daughter was born. cypher in her history suggests shed be so competent and loving, but thither it is. And plenty of well-heeled, highly educated men and women myself included struggle with the transition. Parenting licenses would apt(predicate) be tainted by the same accusations facing our legal body do the affluent have an advantage? Is that tho? 3.Since the act of conceiving a child occurs far outside t he reach of the law, how would we regulate it? Would women be hale to take pregnancy tests? Thats a funny twist in the abortion debate, actually. Is thither a right to choose to become a parent, and if so, can the state stop you? Would men and women who fail a licensing test be obligated to take birth control? What if theyre morally opposed? (After all, you whitethorn opt out of military service for religious and moral objections, if they can be confirmed by church membership or a similar proof. ) 4. What happens to the kids born to unlicensed parents?Are they forcibly taken extraneous from their parents? Who gets them? Again, at that places a potentially ugly social justice issue there poor children, possibly of color, being given to affluent parents, possibly white, because we bound adequate parenting by a standard that doesnt apply universally. (When a recall dose adopted a number child, she learned that each child had to have his own bedroom. In a pricey city, if we have a second kid, theres no way theyll both have their own rooms but if the state is imposing rules, they may well favor the affluent in ways that are unjust or bizarre. 5. Assuming unlicensed parents have children, how will the state pay for costs associated with those childrens care? Most states juvenility and family services offices are already woefully underfunded and many are tragically ineffective. 6. It will become a pricey and chaotic legal battleground. roughly will want same-sex couples to be refused parenting licenses others will argue that unwed parents are undeserving. The court battles will cost millions, and will probably not result in substantially better parenting.In the end, I think thats really the challenge will the licensing process create better parents? Licensing is a one-time act, and an all or nothing proposal. You get the license or you dont. But parenting doesnt work like that. Its a gradual process, with days where we get it right and days when we just plain screw up. You can license a driver because there are, in general, a finite set of circumstances you must be prepared for behind the wheel. Parenting licensure could never be that simple, and so it is doomed. Good opportunity