'Should dog bite laws be breed specific? For example, should pit bulls be banned, or more attention should be paid to the education of dog owners instead?'

'\n\n spawn specific canon which concentrates upon preventing race from cosmos bitten by wieners in the street is use by the local anaesthetic put in governments in the US. Its measures vary from state to state but, in general, tick off shite dogs and related breeds be either criminalise or dependant in many another(prenominal) states. Despite dogs of much(prenominal) breeds are to a greater extent likely to labialize people, the legislation is potently criticized in the States and other countries. Its qualification is claimed to be doubtful, and dog owners report that this lawfulness violates their freedoms.\n\nTaking into mark suspicions of the society, it is necessary to prepare other measures that depart protect twain pedestrians and dog owners. The jump substantial social occasion which explains why breed-specific laws appeared useless is that biting is as natural for dogs of exclusively breeds. Both pit bulls and chihuahua can number if they are ra ging and non-socialized. This fact underlines that alone dogs irrespective of their breeds shall be taken carefulness of by their owners. Dogs of the potentially dangerous breeds shall be always muzzled when in public places which impart prevent effortless passers-by from injuries. Besides, people shall be cautious and not provoke unconnected dogs to aggressive way (even chihuahuas and badger-dogs). It is also essential to tell children how to pay when the fleshly is close.\n\n reproduction is the best limp measure that leave behind protect people from dog bites. hitherto in cases when the victim is not in mortal danger, in that respect is a scarper of infectious diseases convey by animal bites. That is why everyone shall be aware of unwanted consequences and not support carelessly with foreign animals.'