Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Mores Ideal Character in A Man for All Seasons - Literature Essay Samples

In Robert Bolt’s A Man for all Seasons, Thomas More is a man whose sense of self is set in stone. He dies not because he wants to be martyred or made a hero, but because he finds himself unable to compromise his integrity. Throughout the play, the characters that interact with More act as foils. When their priorities are contrasted with his, they more clearly define him as an individual. In this way, the reader achieves a deeper understanding of More by gaining insight into what he is not, rather than what he is. More, the â€Å"uncommon man,† is a singularly pristine figure against a soiled and compromising backdrop.From More’s first conversation, â€Å"the price of a man† is a question that the characters struggle to articulate and understand. The ambitious and impressionable Richard Rich, whose malleable moral compass has been tampered with by reading Machiavelli, insists that â€Å"Every man has his price!† (4). More, whose values are much more deeply rooted, disagrees: MORE: No no no. RICH: Or pleasure. Titles, women, bricks-and-mortar, there’s always something. MORE: Childish RICH: Well, in suffering, certainly. MORE: Buy a man with suffering? RICH: Impose suffering, and offer him – escape. MORE: Oh. For a moment I thought you were being profound. (4-5)More is the type of man who cannot be bought, neither by treasure nor threat of suffering. This initial clash of principles sets a precedent for the rest of More’s interactions with other characters in the play. His inflexible, outspoken sense of justice makes it impossible for him to submit to inequity. More is a man with a great capacity for understanding, but, as the Steward predicts, â€Å"Some day someone’s going to ask him for something that he wants to keep; and he’ll be out of practice† (17).When More meets with Cardinal Wolsey, who has a strikingly utilitarian outlook for a clergy member, Wolsey tells him,  "You’re a constant regret to me, Thomas. If you could just see the facts flat on, without that horrible moral squint; with just a little common sense, you could have been a statesman† (19). Unlike many men, Thomas More’s morality is not simply a perspective which he can choose to wear or cast off like a pair of glasses. Rather, his ideals are a part of him, immutable and inseparable from his identity and sense of self. King Henry pays More a visit to his house for dinner – a pretense to discuss the issue of marriage with him. He wants More to approve his divorce from Catherine and remarriage to Anne Boleyn, so as to appease the public and relieve his own personal conscience:MORE: Then why does Your Grace need my poor support?HENRY: Because you’re honest. What’s more to the purpose, you’re known to be honest . . . There are those like Norfolk who follow me because I wear the crown, and there are those like Master Cromwell who follo w me because they are jackals with sharp teeth and I am their lion, and there is a mass that follows me because it follows anything that moves – and then there is you. (55) More follows not a crown, nor a lion, nor anything else simply because it has pomp and â€Å"power,† but follows what rings true to his own heart. Henry and the people of England know this, and so Henry feels that Thomas’ approval will vindicate his struggle for divorce. More wants to follow the king’s commands, but his conscience simply won’t allow him to.When King Henry requests that More give his blessing on his divorce, he forces More to choose one side of his opposing internal allegiances. More is the king’s loyal subject, but also a man of deep, unshakable faith. Though his consideration for the well-being of his family and his friendship with the king has kept him neutral on the subject of his marriage, Henry’s request pressures Thomas to choose betwee n loyalty to his king or his values (and thereby his faith in God). This core, this undividable moral kernel that is More, cannot be ruled by a king, or any earthly entity; neither can it contradict itself, as the king asks him to. He tries to explain this to Alice: ALICE: You’re too nice altogether, Thomas! MORE: Woman, mind your house. ALICE: I am minding my house! MORE: Well, Alice. What would you want me to do? ALICE: Be ruled! If you won’t rule him, be ruled!MORE: I neither could nor would rule my King. But there’s a little . . . little, area . . . where I must rule myself. It’s very little—less to him than a tennis court. (59)More stands firm and is prepared for whatever may come, but he neither expects nor wants to make any sort of public statement with his refusal to accept the marriage. He avoids being confrontational about his beliefs so as to cause the least amount of trouble for himself and his family. He assures Alice, â€Å"Se t your mind at rest—this is not the stuff of which martyrs are made† (60).Though he is a compassionate, forgiving, and generous man, Thomas More’s principles simply will not be budged. Men like Norfolk, Cromwell, Rich, and Roper have mercurial morals, allowing themselves to rise or fall with every fluxuation in King Henry’s moral temperature. More, however, refuses to buckle to the will of the king, prioritizing purity of conscience over preservation of physical comfort. Unlike the fickle theology of William Roper, More’s foundation is set on rocks, and endures through whatever the world might hurl at him: MORE: . . . Will, I’d trust you with my life. But not your principles. You see, we speak of being anchored to our principles. But if the weather turns nasty you up with an anchor and let it down where there’s less wind, and the fishing’s better. And â€Å"Look,† we say, â€Å"look, I’m anchored to my princip les!† (69) More, as malleable in his morals as a diamond, cannot be changed. He is truly a man for all seasons.Richard Rich, yet another foil to More, is a man who has a price and knows it. In his conversation with Cromwell, he demonstrates his willingness to sacrifice his integrity:CROMWELL: D’you believe that—that you would never repeat or report anything et cetera? RICH: Yes!CROMWELL: No, but seriously.RICH: Why, yes!CROMWELL: Rich; seriously.RICH: It would depend what I was offered. (72)Rich is the type of person whose conscience means little to him. There is a fundamental disconnect between his and More’s priorities. Integrity means a different thing to each of them. Whereas More is a man whose spirit is able to transcend his worldly attachments, Rich fails to hold his soul as sacred, and is willing to sacrifice it for a sum: CROMWELL: You look depressed. RICH: I’m lamenting. I’ve lost my innocence.CROMWELL: You lost it some time ag o. If you’ve only just noticed, it can’t have been very important to you.RICH: That’s true! Why that’s true, it can’t!CROMWELL: We experience a sense of release, do we, Master Rich? An unfamiliar freshness in the head, as of open air? (74)More’s identity, and thereby his entire existence, revolves around his principles. His beliefs are important to him because without them, More cease to be More. It’s not the logic of them that matters to him, but rather that they are part and parcel of what he identifies as himself. To change or compromise his values would be to try to re-sculpt a thing already set in stone. He tries to articulate this to Norfolk:NORFOLK: Does this make sense? You’ll forfeit all you’ve got—which includes the respect of your country—for a theory?MORE: The Apostolic Succession of the Pope is . . . Why, it’s a theory, yes; you can’t see it; you can’ touch i t; it’s a theory. But what matters to me is not whether it’s true or not but that I believe it to be true, or rather, not that I believe it, but that I believe it . . . I trust I make myself obscure? (91)King Henry’s request calls More to do what he cannot: compromise his allegiance and mute his conscience. Though a loyal subject of the king, More’s first and foremost loyalty is to his G-d. He cannot and will not give this up, because to do so would be to give up his very essence. When he refuses to sign a document acknowledging his consent of the King’s divorce, he is accused of treason and thrown in jail. The Common Man, dressed as the Jailer, allows More to be locked up, even though he knows him to be an innocent man. He uses an old expression to rationalize his failure to act:COMMON MAN: â€Å"I’d let him out if I could but I can’t, not without taking up residence in there myself. And he’s in there already, so what ’d be the point? You know the old adage? ‘Better a live rat than a dead lion,’ and that’s about it† (127). The Common Man is â€Å"plain and simple.† He would rather save his own neck than take a stand for what he knows to be right.More hides in â€Å"the forest of the law,† refusing to make a definitive statement about his opinion on the king’s marriage. By remaining silent, he deadlocks the prosecution against him. Rich, whose price turns out to be Wales, is eventually called to give a false testimony against More to expedite the process. With his false account of More’s actions, More is found guilty of high treason and sentenced to death. In his last informal conversation with Norfolk, Norfolk berates More for his refusal to give into King Henry’s commands. More attempts, one last time, to make Norfolk understand what it is that compels him to be so adamant about his beliefs:NORFOLK: Oh, that’s immut able, is it? The one fixed point in a world of changing friendships is that Thomas More will not give in!MORE: To me it has to be, for that’s myself. Affection goes as deep in me as you think, but only G-d is love right through, Howard; and that’s my self.NORFOLK: And who are you? Goddammit, man, it’s disproportionate! We’re supposed to be the arrogant ones, the proud, splenetic ones – and we’ve all given in! Why must you stand out? You’ll break my heart. (122)Norfolk is deeply troubled by what he sees as a painful and illogical sacrifice on More’s part. Unable to see beyond the immediate, physical impact of things, he is frustrated with Thomas, because he cannot find a direct or tangible rationale for his friend’s actions. Though undeniably a good man, Norfolk has a spiritual shallowness to him, and fails to comprehend the ultimate significance of actions. His decision to succumb to the king’s will isnâ€℠¢t, for him, morally compromising. He simply doesn’t see an evident reason to stick his neck out, so he chooses to keep quiet. In this way, he is another foil to More, who goes on to tell Norfolk:MORE: And what would you do with a water spaniel that was afraid of water? You’d hang it! Well, as a spaniel is to water, so is a man to his own self. I will not give in because I oppose it – I do – not my pride, not my spleen, nor any other of my appetites but I do, I! (123)More’s very essence is at stake in his decision. Without his faith, he is but a shell of himself, of no more consequence than a water spaniel who can’t swim. When he talks with his daughter Margaret for the last time, More tries to make her understand what it is that drives him. She asks him, â€Å"Haven’t you done as much as G-d can reasonably want?† (141) In a tone that suggests that he has come to terms with the situation, he replies, â€Å"Well . . . Fin ally . . . It isn’t a matter of reason; finally it’s a matter of love.† (141)More’s unshakable devotion to his ideals stems from a deeply rooted connection with G-d. Even after he has done all for his faith that could be expected of him, More insists on remaining true to his morals. He makes the decision to go above and beyond his obligations not to save face or because he is a stubborn old man, but because, as any man in love, he is willing to do irrational things for his â€Å"Agape.† When Richard Rich gives a false testimony, claiming that More spoke treasonously of the king, the court is able to sentence More to death. He is taken to the cutting block and decapitated. In the wake of the execution, the Common Man removes his mask and comes to the center of the stage: â€Å"I’m breathing . . . Are you breathing too? . . . it’s nice, isn’t it? It isn’t difficult to keep alive friends – just don’t make trouble – or if you must make trouble, make the sort of trouble that’s expected† (162-3).Like Rich, Norfolk, Wolsey, and Cromwell, the Common Man is a foil to Thomas More. He allows himself to be led around on a leash, acting as he is ordered to, without consideration to his own sense of right and wrong. More is clearly cast of a different mettle: His decision to adhere to his ideals is rooted in a unique, genuine joy and faith in G-d, and so transcends â€Å"logical† justifications for acting differently.In this day and age, the idealist is often considered impractical, irrational, and even ludicrous in his fidelity to hope. More’s is the story of a man whose ideals were greater than his flesh. He clung to them beyond â€Å"reason,† beyond obligation, and beyond necessity, not out of fear or inability, but out of love. It was this love; this spirit of divine grace that was interwoven into More’s every action that gave his him the tenacity to outlast his physical body. More the body died, but in doing so immortalized those aspects of himself that were most remarkable: his passion, his fidelity, his faith, and his love.

Wednesday, May 20, 2020

A qu familiares puede pedir un residente permanente

Los residentes permanentes legales, es decir, aquellas personas que tienen a su nombre una tarjeta de residencia (green card) pueden pedir a dos tipos de familiares: esposos e hijos solteros. Es decir, a diferencia de lo que ocurre con los ciudadanos americanos, los residentes permanentes no pueden pedir los papeles para sus hijos casados ni tampoco para sus padres o madres ni para sus hermanos. Ni tampoco a sus prometidos. Si tienen al novio/a en otro paà ­s y à ©ste desea visitar, hay que conocer las reglas. Desde el punto de vista de las leyes de inmigracià ³n, los familiares a los que puede pedir un residente permanente està ¡n clasificados en dos categorà ­as, que es importante recordar, porque los tiempos de espera està ¡n determinados por ellas: F2A: esposos y esposas de residentes e hijos solteros menores de 21 aà ±os de edad.F2B: hijos de residentes permanentes que està ¡n solteros y tienen 21 aà ±os o mà ¡s. A tener en cuenta en los trà ¡mites para solicitar la green card para estos familiares Tiempos de espera Cada mes el Departamento de Estado publica un nuevo Boletà ­n de Visas. Comprobar en las categorà ­as F2A y F2B quà © fecha de corte se publica. Eso quiere decir que todas las peticiones con una fecha de prioridad anterior a ese dà ­a publicado en el boletà ­n de visas comienzan a tramitarse por el Centro Nacional de Visas (NVC, por sus siglas en inglà ©s). Se inicia la fase final del proceso y en unos meses habrà ¡ llegado a su fin. Quà © pasa si la persona està ¡ ya en Estados Unidos Si està ¡ ilegalmente no puede ajustar su estatus en ningà ºn caso. Por lo tanto asesorarse con un abogado de inmigracià ³n antes de enviar los papeles al Servicio de Inmigracià ³n y Ciudadanà ­a (USCIS, por sus siglas en inglà ©s). Ya que si se envà ­an lo à ºnico que se hace es pagar por nada. Si està ¡ legalmente en Estados Unidos hay dos posibilidades: si puede mantener su estatus legal durante todo el tiempo que dure la tramitacià ³n, por ejemplo, si tiene una visa de trabajo, entonces puede optar a un ajuste de estatus. Si se hace asà ­ asegurarse de presentar bien los papeles y la persona pedida deberà ­a asesorarse legalmente antes de salir del paà ­s hasta acabar toda la tramitacià ³n.si està ¡ legalmente pero no puede mantener ese estatus durante toda la tramitacià ³n entonces debe salir de los Estados Unidos dentro del plazo que tiene para abandonar el paà ­s legalmente. Por ejemplo, si un extranjero entra como turista y se casa con residente permanente no puede esperar dentro de Estados Unidos. Debe salirse y si no lo hace pueden aparecer toda clase de problemas, como que se le aplique el castigo de los tres y diez aà ±os. La consecuencia es que por no querer esperar fuera del paà ­s unos meses va a tener que esperar varios aà ±os. Si se està ¡ fuera de Estados Unidos hay que esperar allà ­ hasta pasar una entrevista en la Embajada o consulado y recibir una visa de inmigrante. Estas son las posibilidades  de recibir una visa de turista mientras se espera por los papeles para emigrar. Quà © sucede si residente pide a hijo soltero y durante la tramitacià ³n à ©ste se casa La peticià ³n deja de tener efecto. Ya que no se puede conceder una visa de inmigrante a un hijo casado de un residente permanente. Si no se avisa lo que va a pasar es que al llegar la entrevista se va a denegar la visa. Jamà ¡s mentir a Inmigracià ³n o a un consulado sobre una cosa tan importante como es el estado civil. En estos casos, todas las cuotas pagadas a Inmigracià ³n se pierden ya que no se reintegra el dinero. Quà © pasa si un residente permanente pide a un familiar y durante la tramitacià ³n se naturaliza y se convierte en ciudadano Puede notificarlo ya que los esposos e hijos solteros menores de 21 aà ±os de un ciudadano no tienen que esperar a que haya visa de inmgrante disponible para ellos. Esto quiere decir que probablemente el proceso se haga mà ¡s rà ¡pido. Quà © pasa si residente permanente pide a cà ³nyuge y à ©ste tiene hijos Los hijos del cà ³nyuge pueden tambià ©n ser pedidos incluyà ©ndolos en la misma peticià ³n si son menores de 21 aà ±os y està ¡n solteros. Si durante el tiempo de espera de la tramitacià ³n alguno de ellos cumple los 21 se tendrà ¡ que hacer una peticià ³n nueva para esa persona, incluyendo una copia de la peticià ³n original. Matrimonio, su validez y derechos migratorios de gays y lesbianas Para que un matrimonio produzca efectos migratorios tiene que tener validez. Ademà ¡s, desde junio de 2014 desde el punto de vista migratorio no hay diferencias en cuanto a los beneficios entre el matrimonio entre un hombre y una mujer que el de entre gays o lesbianas. Consejo a tener en cuenta Las personas que desean emigrar a los Estados Unidos deben tener en cuenta un hecho irrefutable: es un paà ­s distinto. Por lo tanto, lo mejor para evitar problemas por un lado y para conocer los derechos por otro, lo aconsejable es familiarizarse cuanto antes con 10 aspectos bà ¡sicos de la vida en el paà ­s.   Este es un artà ­culo informativo. No es asesorà ­a legal.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Animal Testing Should Be Banned - 1985 Words

Animals have been used to advance medical science for thousands of years, dating back to the time of ancient Greece, where scientists such as Aristotle and Erasistratus used animals for experimentation, and Galen who is considered to be one of the most important physicians of the ancient Roman empire conducted experiments using animals that advanced the understanding of anatomy, physiology, pathology, and pharmacology (Animal Testing and Medicine 1). An Arab physician by the name of Ibn Zuhr also introduced the idea of animals being used to test experimental surgical procedures before applying them to human patients. Poisoning and severe side effects has resulted from drugs being released to the public without testing, this caused a law to†¦show more content†¦Animals are essential for biomedical research because they are biologically similar to humans, this allows scientists to see how proposed treatments affect the body. Also, some diseases can only be studied in living or ganisms, and the use of humans is unethical and illegal. Biomedical research using animal experimentation has helped to increase the safety of the public against many diseases. In recent history, scientists have been capable of creating treatments against diseases such as polio, smallpox, whooping cough, and measles which affect or have affected a large part of the human population. Scientists also used what they learn through past research to create treatments for diseases that have become epidemics recently, such as Ebola which recently spread across most of Africa. Without the research animals used from animals, epidemics could have been even more devastating on the human population. Animals are used in biomedical research because their basic cell processes are the same as humans. Mice share about ninety eight percent of DNA with a human, which makes them susceptible to the same types of diseases humans are. In addition â€Å" Many basic cell processes are the same in all animal s, and the bodies of animals are like humans in the way that they perform many vital functions such as breathing, digestion, movement, sight, hearing, and reproduction† (Why Animals are Used 1). Because of these similarities, scientists are able to develop and

The Asian Value Debate - 686 Words

The â€Å"Asian Value† debate came to prominence when it was strongly advocated by the Prime Minister of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew and also Mahathir Mohamad. Asian Values predicated on the idea that Asian countries have a unique set of institutions and political ideologies that reflect the regions cultures and histories. Although Asia consists of diverse ethnicity and cultures who practice various religions, the core basis of most Asian cultures are similar such as the importance of collectivism and consensus. Asia as a whole lacked a regional institutional mechanism, and because of this ‘Asian Values’ has been interpreted differently by different ethnic and religious groups (Langguth, 2003). Mahathir introduced the concept of Asian values in the 1990’s where there was global democratization, political and economic stability before the currency crisis of July 1997, which shocked Asian countries (Naisbitt, 1997). Asian values were advocated by Mahathir to try to unite Malaysia as a nation. He used it as a platform to claim collectivism, defending the ‘East’ against the imperialistic designs of the Western world. Mahathir’s views, known as the ‘Mahathirism’ can be summarized as combining a universalist Islam, a developmental nationalism, and a more laissez-faire approach to the people as an attempt at mass appeal to Malaysians. Errol P. Mendes (1994) described the Malaysian version of Asian values as â€Å"The Mahathir Model† to differentiate it from other types of Asian values. ThisShow MoreRelatedTaking a Look at Confusian Ethics669 Words   |  3 Pagesand unmet needs; and the ability to apply appropriate knowledge effectively, which is knowledge separate from the rest. †¢ Guanxi: Another very common recognizable facet in East Asian country’s business practices is the importance of personal relationships (guanxi), which can be associated with traditional Confucian values (14). According to Chung and Hamilton (15), Gaunxi is a sociological term that describes a subset of Chinese personal connections between people (relationships) in which one individualRead MoreThe Parenting Of Asian Mothers Essay1368 Words   |  6 Pagesmany centuries, cultures from all around have had many debates on the correct way of parenting. In recent times, a specific type of parenting has been in the spotlight: the parenting of Asian mothers. They are known as very passive and submissive to strangers, but to their own kids they turn around 360 and becoming very aggressive and demanding. Many Westerners think Easterners way of parenting is cruel and inhumane. Westerners think that Asian mothers have goals that are unrealistic; they are selfishRead MoreLiterature About China s Rise Of East Asia Varies Across International Relations Essay1673 Words   |  7 Pagespurpose questioned, and a prospect of war was low. IR Debates Within the IR field of study, the debate about China’s rise offers divergent viewpoints. For example, the opposing views between Offensive Realist Mearsheimer, and eclectic arguments by Kang. In a 2003 article, â€Å"Getting Asia Wrong,† Kang responds directly to Offensive Realist claims by Mearsheimer in 2001, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Opposing the central assumption that Asian states would resist China, other states as per KangRead MoreReligious and Ethnic Diversity Paper685 Words   |  3 Pagesethnicity group that I pick to talk about is Asian (Asian descent) I have learned a lot since this class about the different type of ethnicity group but I work a lot around Asian when I am at work. These two choices are different from each other but I would love to learn more about their religion and ethnicity group. My selected of religion groups are different for other religious groups because the religion group do not have the same beliefs, values, or worship practices as other religion groupRead MoreAre Human Rights Universal? Essay1601 Words   |  7 Pagesinvestigated in this essay, by: exploring definitions and history on human rights, debating on whether it is universal while providing examples and background information while supporting my hypothesis that human rights should be based on particular cultural values and finally drawing a conclusion. A general definition of human rights are that they are rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled to, simply because there human. It is the idea that ‘all human beings are born free and equal in dignityRead MoreCritical Thinking And Teaching Methods1648 Words   |  7 Pagesfallen to twenty-seventh place according to the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Ironically, the definition of critical thinking, an often-used pedagogical term, requires the process of critical thinking, criticism, and debate, as the definition widely varies amongst communication scholars, educators, and philosophers, and is seldom properly defined (Lai, p. 5-10). The components of critical thinking are hotly debated and therefore need to be clarified for the intents andRead MoreCase Study : Big Business Tobacco1386 Words   |  6 Pagesparticular debate, Big Business Tobacco, Mary Bender, Randall Hedges and cigarette consumers are the main stakeholders. Big Business Tobacco aims to maximize its profits in the new market in Asian nations so the conclusion of the debate will determine the income levels it will get. Mary Bender being the marketing manager wishes to offer a stiff competition to the local companies manufacturing tobacco products in Asia and acquire a large market share. The final suggestions of the debate on how theRead MoreThe Ethics Of Confucian Business Ethics1172 Words   |  5 PagesLagan (2006) is the conflict between harmony in the business environment and the competition of capitalistic markets in the ethical debate on the efficacy of Confucian business ethics. Lagan’s (2006) case study effectively defines the overarching harmony of universal mandates defined by Confucius, which argued against the pro-capitalist interpretations of Confucian values to adapt to modern business ethics. In my own views, I believe in this traditional form of the three rules of Confucian ethics:Read MoreThe Fundamental International Charter For Human Rights1444 Words   |  6 Pagesto create implement a universally accepted charter of human rights have met many obstacles. Key issues i ncluding minority groups, gender, and the concept of individuality versus collectivism make up the many complicated shades of grey within this debate. To better understand the challenges that the concept of universal human rights faces, it is necessary to analyse the cultural, religious, and developmental dilemmas that jeopardise its legitimacy on a global scale. The foundational internationalRead MoreNative American Population History And Genetics988 Words   |  4 Pagesmost recently human populated continents on the planet, at around 15,000 years before present. The Asian ancestors of Native Americans crossed over a land bridge, connecting Asia to North America, during the earths last glacial maximum in the late Pleistocene (Dennis et al., 2010). Native American population history and genetics are still very new subjects of research and there is still much debate over questions such as: What routes were taken by the migrating Native American peoples? When was the

Short High School Level Speech on Beauty First Draft Writting free essay sample

Beauty is madness, its chaotic. We must stop prioritizing perfection and superficiality. We must start highlighting the grace we already possess. The current media ideal of thinness is achieved by less than 5% of the female population. The models you see in magazines envy their own pictures, they wish they could look like the figure in the photograph yet they are, on average 57 and only 117lbs. Their looks are unrealistic, its not compatible with life. Understand that that 8 million people in the US suffer from an eating disorder. 0% are women and girls. These people shed tears when they get on the scale. Yet. they have a perfectly normal BMI If you havent already noticed, males are also effected. Approximately 800 000 men/ boys have a problems with their bodies. I can see why Most of us girls talk about their bodies behind their back and to their face. They also have the pressure of comparison to other guys. We will write a custom essay sample on Short High School Level Speech on Beauty First Draft Writting or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page If your handsome you have a HUGE advantage over other guys, because, well, girls can be super superficial. And Im talking all girls all the time, but many boys are using unproven supplements or steroids. Its not just teenagers that are being effected anymore. 80% of children are afraid of being fat. A vast percentile of 10 year old girls said they want to be thinner. 80% of them have already dieted. When I was 10, I sneaking candy with my best friends and pigging out while playing spy kids in my backyard. The world is not how it used to be Your face is not a mask, stop hiding under layers of make-up. The people of this world are turning into cosmetic slaves. I know a woman who never left the house with out make-up, her hair perfectly coifed and dressed flawless outfits. The makeup clogged her pores, her hair was suffocating underneath layers of hairspray and her nearly unbearable shoes reached havoc on her feet. Then she met a man. Today she no longer wears makeup, she is not afraid to hide her natural beauty. She wears her hair in a mess of dreads and is now engaged. There are so many ways of being beautiful. You dont have to be tall and thin to be gorgeous. We must love ourselves for the way we are. We are all beautiful. ?

Article Review on Measuring Violence Against Women-Free Samples

Question: Measuring Violence Against Women Statistical Trends? Answer: Introducation: This article provides a complete picture of violence against women as well as girls. With the new and emerging issues that are evolving in recent times, there is a data gap present that exists such as trafficking in persons, increased emphasis upon building evidence on matters relating to promising prevention and the intervention practices. The emerging issues identified are cyber-violence. Violence against women has been identified at both national as well as international level and has become one of the serious concerns that are obstruction to gender equality and women human rights and fundamental freedoms. It needs considerate the different proportions of the specific global trouble through data collection as well as analysis where the decision makers aims at developing and evaluating the measures that is designed to prevent and eliminate violence against women (Donohoe 2016). The article is organized in various sections that explain the incidence and rigorousness of violence agai nst women, identifying the risk factors that are connected with violence against women. As rightly put forward by Sinha (2013), measures are generally has gender-specific data analysis that help in addressing the factors in association with violence in and against girls and women and need of victims. The analysis mainly tracks in violence in and against women over time that acts as an indicator of whether the circumstances of violence have worsened in Canada. Adding to that, the section will be examining the situation of violence against women that are victim and highlights the gendered dimension of the issue of violence against women. This mainly takes into consideration various violence like intimate partner violence, criminal harassment and sexual assault. In this case, the statistical data used are generated from police reports (Dillon et al. 2013). There are various risk facts in association with violence against women. In that case, there are many descriptive analysis that have been conducted based on the social factors such as lifestyle, social class and community facts that are directly linked with the research article topic. The main sources of data can be generated from the self-report victimization data where some analysis is being conducted by using police-reported data. Furthermore, the criminal justice responses towards violence against women that has shifted over past 30 years. Women, mostly do not file any report when they face violence due to fear. They rather take support of informal sources such as friends and family as mentioned in the victimization data. The violence faced by women should be reported to the criminal justice so that victims get the punishment for their crime. In that case, when violence against women are reported to the police and other authorities concerned, then the victim gets the criminal cha rges as mentioned in the police-reported data (Dartnall and Jewkes 2013). Police-reported surveys considers as one of the important indicator when the nature of all Criminal Codes offences are mention and come in attention to police. It collects the administrative data on an annual basis where it includes police services in Canada. Reference List Dartnall, E. and Jewkes, R., 2013. Sexual violence against women: the scope of the problem.Best practice research Clinical obstetrics gynaecology,27(1), pp.3-13. Dillon, G., Hussain, R., Loxton, D. and Rahman, S., 2013. Mental and physical health and intimate partner violence against women: A review of the literature.International journal of family medicine,2013. Donohoe, M., 2016. Individual and societal forms of violence against women in the US and the developing world: an overview.Current Womens Health Reports,2, pp.313-319. Sinha, M., 2013. Measuring violence against women: Statistical trends.Juristat: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, p.1. (Accessed from: https://search.proquest.com/openview/5c799dab5832c35fefe950091a21dd40/1?pq-origsite=gscholarcbl=44168)